Loading…
One Deep Dive. Every Day.
India produces more news than most of us can humanly process. The result is a constant scroll of headlines and hot takes—plenty of noise, little context. IndianContext exists to solve that problem. We publish one carefully researched explainer each day so readers can step back, see the whole picture, and understand why it matters.
Our lens is India-first and evidence-led. We start with the source material, add history and definitions, surface trade-offs, and foreground citizen impact. No paywalls, no clickbait, no sensational framing—just the context you need to think clearly.
Cutting Through the Noise
Breaking coverage often drops crucial context: what the rule was before, how it changed, who benefits, and what might go wrong during implementation. Complex topics—judicial rulings, fiscal moves, regulatory changes—get reduced to a single quote or a chart without the caveats that actually matter.
We do the opposite. Each explainer reconstructs the full story: the background, the text, the intent, the incentives, and the potential outcomes. We assume intelligence but not insider knowledge, and we write in plain language so the conclusions are yours—not ours.
Whether it is a Supreme Court judgment, a new economic policy, or a cultural inflection point, we trace the lineage, examine stakeholder positions, and outline implications you can act on.
Our Editorial Process
Primary Source Priority
Every explainer begins with the originals: constitutional provisions, laws, court judgments, notifications, government reports, audited datasets, and official transcripts. Only after reading the source do we consult secondary coverage for triangulation.
Source Verification
Claims are traced back to their first point of record and cross-checked against independent data where available. We annotate contradictions, scope limits, and uncertainties instead of smoothing them over.
Fact-Checking
A three-step review looks for accuracy, context, and clarity. We test figures, recreate calculations, and read footnotes—because footnotes change conclusions.
Neutrality
Policy rationales, implementation challenges, stakeholder incentives, and citizen impact are presented side-by-side. We avoid partisan framing and explain competing viewpoints in good faith.
Corrections
If we miss something, we fix it. Substantive updates are marked at the top of the article with a timestamp and a plain-language note describing what changed and why.
Who We Are
IndianContext is a collective of writers, researchers, and curious citizens committed to building clarity. We come from policy, economics, law, technology, and the social sciences, and we are united by the belief that informed readers make better decisions.
Independence is our operating principle. We are bootstrapped, accept no sponsored content, and keep the product simple by design. The work is rigorous, the voice is calm, and the goal is usefulness.
As the project grows, we will welcome domain experts and practitioners who can deepen our coverage while adhering to the same standards of neutrality and evidence.
Collective team mosaic
Why One Story Daily
1
Quality Control
Daily cadence gives research room to breathe. Hours go into reading, verification, and re-writing so that each piece holds up months later.
2
Depth Over Breadth
We pick the story that matters beyond the next news cycle—what shapes institutions, markets, or citizen life over time.
3
Reader Experience
Explainers are crafted for a focused 7–10 minute read, with plain language, helpful structure, and zero clutter.
4
Impact Assessment
We highlight who is affected, where trade-offs lie, and how implementation might diverge from intent.
5
Context Gap
Background, history, and definitions come first. Jargon is translated. Assumptions are stated upfront.
6
Reader Input
Topic suggestions and factual nudges are welcome. If you work in the field we cover, your perspective can improve the piece.
How We Operate
Funding
We are bootstrapped. There are no ads, sponsored posts, or paid placements. Independence is not a slogan—it’s the product design.
Independence
Editorial decisions are made in the public interest. If a potential conflict exists, it is disclosed clearly in the article.
Accountability
Factual mistakes are corrected within 24 hours and marked at the top of the piece. Reader feedback that improves accuracy or nuance is welcomed.
Editorial Calendar
We plan weekly around significant hearings, announcements, and releases—but we will switch tracks for developments with lasting impact. Suggestions from practitioners are particularly useful.
Feedback or topic suggestions? Write to [email protected].